Our Score:

John Carter Review: Sci-Fi’s Original Hero is a Hit

Posted by on March 10, 2012

Take sci-fi elements from Star Wars, the aliens from Avatar, and the style from Prince of Persia, mix them all together, and what do you get? Disney’s latest blockbuster, John Carter, which on the surface might seem like the world’s most expensive knockoff with a rumored $250 million budget, but is in fact a film adaptation based on a series of Edgar Rice Burroughs novels that date back to 1912 and helped influence legendary film creators George Lucas and James Cameron create the billion-dollar franchises we all know and love today.

While John Carter might be one hundred years late to the party he started due to various setbacks in development, director Andrew Stanton (WALL-E, Finding Nemo) has once again been able to find life on another planet and further expand his resume. As either a voice-actor, writer, producer, or director, Stanton has played a major role in almost all of Pixar’s greatest hits over the past fifteen years; John Carter marks his first journey into the world of live-action films, and he’s created a beautiful new film franchise that holds its own against other sci-fi juggernauts directed by industry vets.

The story of John Carter’s journey begins on Earth in 1857 during the American Civil War. As a former captain of the Confederate Army who no longer wants to fight and is searching for gold, Carter discovers an ancient secret in an Arizona cave that results in his instant transportation to Mars. After arriving on Mars, Carter learns that his strength and agility have greatly increased due to Mars’ decreased gravity, giving him superhero-like powers. Carter is then captured by an Avatar-looking species of aliens who find an interest in him after witnessing his gravity-defying jumping abilities. Shortly thereafter, due to a new love interest who turns out to be the Princess of Mars, Carter finds himself in the middle of another civil war between two similar human races that inhabit Mars.

If you’re simply looking for an enjoyable sci-fi flick with tons of action and an emotional tie-in and not trying to play scientist by critiquing what should and should not be possible, then John Carter‘s story will deliver on all levels. Carter’s journey is somewhat predictable due to so many other forms of media copying Burroughs’ ideas over the past one hundred years, yet, some surprise twists towards the end help the story stand out from being what seems like another generic sci-fi flick and leave a lasting impression that will have you wondering what’s next for the franchise.

Stanton’s vision of the dusty Martian home world is absolutely beautiful, and the special effects make for some thrilling action sequences that will never lose your interest. There are a couple areas that could have used a little extra time in the editing room, like a certain hovercraft scene, but the overall effects are amazing and on par with other recent CGI-heavy sci-fi hits like Avatar. However, unlike Avatar, the movie wasn’t shot in 3D, so the post-converted 3D effects are nothing spectacular, and saving your money and viewing John Carter in a clearer and brighter 2D experience is highly recommended.

Leading actor Taylor Kitsch, who moviegoers might recognize from the Friday Night Lights television series or as Gambit in 2009′s X-Men Origins: Wolverine, nails his role as John Carter from start to finish. It’s no surprise that Hollywood is looking for Kitsch to become one of its next leading men with him also starring in Battleship this summer. Another Wolverine alum, actress Lynn Collins, also does a spectacular job as the Princess of Mars, that is, if you can manage to remember anything she says while getting lost in her beautifully-enhanced deep blue eyes.

Although Kitsch and Collins both create memorable characters through their terrific performances, veteran Willem Dafoe’s superb acting as the alien leader Tars Tarkas, combined with Stanton’s use of motion capture technology, helps bring another level of emotion to the film. Again, like Avatar, the CGI is done so well that you’ll instantly become immersed in the story being told and believe what you’re seeing on screen is real, despite how unreal the eight-foot-tall four-armed green alien being played by Dafoe on stilts might look.

A summer blockbuster in early March, John Carter manages to be another hit for Disney. While the film doesn’t outdo other big-budget sci-fi/fantasy franchises, John Carter‘s hundred-year-old story holds its own in modern times and makes for a thrilling action-packed experience. Taylor Kitsch’s transition to leading male and Andrew Stanton’s transition from animated films to live-action are both a huge success and hopefully we’ll see the two team up again for more John Carter films in the future. John Carter gets 4 out of 5 stars (Great).

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
User Score:
Rating: 3.8/5 (11 votes cast)
Around The Net
Around The Net
Around The Net
Around The Net
  • http://moviestinger.com Vinnie Leduc

    Willem Dafoe and Andrew Stanton? +1 +1 +1

  • Veeto

    Great movie!

  • gman

    this movie was great to bad it faild at making back the money they put in to it.  i hope they make even in the long run. people please go watch this movie have a good time , ..

  • Xen11

    You know what I really like about this film, is that it felt like it stayed true to itself.   It stayed serious.  There were no stupid “comic relief” characters that dumb things down for the audience, at least none that I remember.   

    It was a nice two and half hours long (longer films are always better).  I know its not about length, but quality.  But length allows a story to be told whereas most times, a studio forces a film to be a crappy 90 minutes, making it forgettable and usually cookie cutter crap.    I want exploration of a story, otherwise what’s the point.  I want to get lost in the world being presented.

    I also admire Disney pouring lots of money into this.   Believe in what you’re presenting and don’t hold back.  The supposedly low box office does not matter.   People will watch this eventually, whether its at the cinema or at home.  Disney would be stupid not to go through with the sequel.  Follow through with the planned series, people will follow.   That’s why all these sequels are money makers.  A story that continues a beloved existing story is usually a win win situation.  People fall in love.  

    I thought John Carter was pretty good; I wouldn’t say great, just good.  Not bad.  I look forward to the sequel.   For what it was, it certainly did it well.  

  • http://moviestinger.com Vinnie Leduc

    After passing out repeatedly in theaters watching this, I finally got around to giving it another chance on video…. and my troll hate for John Carter has officially eased to neutrality. Subtitles made it SOOOO much easier to understand, and the no crappy 3D helped as well. Regarding your review, Paul, I definitely agree about Dafoe’s great performance, but the CGI and action was still not impressive to me at all, although I did like that short one-man army sequence. The movie got better and better in the last third or so, and I really liked the ending. That and another awesome score from Michael Giacchino were the highlights to me. Disney’s efforts to make JC its next big franchise are admirable, I’ll admit, and it would indeed be interesting to see how they adapt the next few books, but unfortunately with the box office bombing that the studio blamed for causing its $160-200 million quarterly loss and that led to studio chairman Rich Ross’s forced resignation, that probably won’t happen. Another sad case in which dollars dictates art. I don’t hate JC anymore, but I wouldn’t say I liked it either… but John Carter definitely deserved better.

New Movies In Theaters
New Video Games
Coming Soon
New On Blu-ray & DVD
Top 10 User Rated Stingers
Latest User Comments
Like Us On Facebook