Our Score:

Lockout (Re)View

Posted by on April 12, 2012

Is it Taken in space? No. I’m just glad it’s not the disappointing Unknown in space. Luc Besson’s latest production, the sci-fi action thriller Lockout, is comparable to his previous, Colombiana. But what made me like it over Colombiana is Lockout‘s reckless audacity and sheer ridiculousness. It’s like a cheap county fair ride that’s an obvious and janky rip-off of a Six Flags attraction, but the bottom line is it’s fun as hell while still managing to deliver the thrills. Just don’t expect much beyond that.

The debut of directing/writing duo James Mather and Stephen St. Leger (with some help from co-writer and producer Luc Besson), Lockout doesn’t take itself seriously at all. I didn’t know it was gonna be part comedy, but I found myself surprisingly amused with Emmy winner Guy Pearce’s portrayal of the most recycled protagonist in recent entertainment history. Cocky, arrogant, selfish, egotistical. His wisecracking character is the stereotypical early ’90s action hero with a slight hint of Jack Sparrow. This Guy farts cheesy sarcasm out of his mouth when he’s not kicking ass with his muscles that have muscles (he’s considerably bulked up for Lockout). It’s far from the seemingly sophisticated role he’ll have in the upcoming Prometheus, another sci-fi flick that we’re highly anticipating.

The jerky hardass is a microcosm of the movie itself, which borrows (to put it very nicely) from too many other movies and video games to list. Here’s the set-up: a wrongly convicted protagonist with a bad attitude is given the chance to earn his freedom by saving the President’s daughter, who’s held hostage by inmates who’ve overrun a prison. Every phrase of that synopsis can be tracked back to more than one previous movie or video game. But Lockout doesn’t seem to give two sh!ts. Shamelessly ripping off dozens of stuff that came before it, it has resurrected its own Frankenstein of action thrillers… but in space!

Lockout is a decade or two late. The heavily green-screened, previous-gen CGI might’ve been passable… in 2002. The depiction of 2079 is like what people imagined the future to be… last century. You know, unnecessary automated voices, thick metal doors sliding vertically and slowly, loud beeping and booping from omnipresent devices and machines, an overload of computer-font subtitles telling you who’s who and where multiple times. Lockout‘s a brainless and corny popcorn movie like Wrath of the Titans, except with extra cheese.

But despite all of that, I truly enjoyed it. Lockout tries to have fun, be funny, and nothing else really. Works for me, if barely. It sucks that it’s PG-13, but Lockout could’ve easily been rated R, and I have a feeling the video release will include an unrated version. It’s by no means a good movie, but its C+ grade gets a little boost for being such an entertaining don’t-give-a-ffff joy ride. Lockout gets 3 out of 5 stars or B-.

GD Star Rating
a WordPress rating system
Around The Net
Around The Net
Around The Net
Around The Net
  • http://MovieStinger.com Paul Curtin

    Shoot ‘Em Up In Space. Sign Me Up!

    • http://moviestinger.com Vinnie Leduc

      it’s not quite AS ridiculous or bloody, but i DID think about your favorite movie Shoot ‘Em Up while writing this haha

      • http://MediaStinger.com/ Paul Curtin

        Yeah, it’s no Shoot ‘Em Up, but like you said, it’s somewhat entertaining. The CGI in the bike crash scene at the start is up there with Ultraviolet for worst CGI I’ve ever seen in a highly advertised new movie (not going back to an old one like watching The Matrix today). Should have gone for the hard-R.

    • Xen11

      I just came back from seeing it.     I definitely recommend waiting to see it on Blu or whatever.  It’s mostly a bore, BUT the middle chunk is pretty entertaining.  The two leads played by Pearce and Grace are fantastic and are magic.  But whenever they are not on screen, its just a boring cliche, which is what its meant to be, except I don’t think they wanted it to be boring.  

      If only the two characters, played by those actors, had a better movie to be in.   The concept and setting had major potential.  If only they fleshed the movie out and took more care into the nuisances of it, it could have been an epic blockbuster.   But just like its numbers at the box office, its pretty forgettable cannon fodder. 

  • Xen11

    Last night is in theaters.    To see or not to see, that is the question.   If anyone can reply in time, is it worth seeing in the theater, as in, is it loud and does it take advantage of the theater experience?       

    There are certain movies that just really crank up on the volume, forcing you to love the film.  Yea, it could just be the individual theater’s sound system, but I’ve noticed there are certain action movies that really envelope you.    Examples:  G.I. Joe Rise Of The Cobra,  Daybreakers, The Mummy.

    • http://moviestinger.com Vinnie Leduc

      I try to watch as many movies as possible in theaters to give each movie the proper experience (it’s just too bad I can’t control other annoying people there), especially if it’s a horror, action, or loud blockbuster movie. If you don’t have an awesome set-up at home, then I’d suggest you watch Lockout in theaters for the best, immersive experience. Hope you enjoy it!

    • http://MovieStinger.com Paul Curtin

      I really want to see this in theaters, but I’m just going to wait and add it to the list of movies I’ve missed over the past six months that will give me a good reason to re-activate my Netflix.

  • Xen11

    And thanks for the replies, guys.

New Movies In Theaters
New Video Games
Coming Soon
New On Blu-ray & DVD
Top 10 User Rated Stingers
Latest User Comments
Like Us On Facebook